An 3.9 image for developers

stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 13:32:14 UTC 2006


yeap!

On 14 sept. 06, at 15:16, Hernan Tylim wrote:

> Well, since Keymapping is also used by Romain's services (I think,  
> but probably we should ask him), and services are already part of  
> the image, I would add Keymapping and not Keybinder. Once  
> keymapping is in place one could re-write the window switcher to  
> use a keybinding from keymapping. All the other features of  
> KeyBinder are already present in keymapping.
>
> For 3.10 I would vote to add the required modifications to the  
> squeak's event mechanism in the squeak core so further packages  
> could be developed without relying on custom modifications to the  
> event's core.
>
> Regards,
> Hernán
>
> On 9/14/06, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at laposte.net> wrote: Hernan  
> Tylim a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > I saw on the web page that KeyBinder might be part of the image so I
> > just wanted to warn that KeyBinder does a very subtle hack, but a  
> hack
> > nevertheless, to the key event mechanism in order to trap the key- 
> bindings.
> >
> > This warning is because if someone would want to install another
> > keybinding mechanism , like keymapping I guess, it might mest  
> something
> > up, but don't know for sure, didn't test it.
>
> So, what should I do ? KeyBinder is very cool for switching between
> windows and other things like this. Does one of you have an opinion ?
>
> Thank you for pointing this
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Saludos,
> Hernán
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list