On 23-Sep-06, at 9:37 AM, Bryce Kampjes wrote:

> stephane ducasse writes:
>> Sure but if we do not say that it is final then not enough people
>> look at it.
>> So at some points we should stop.
>>
>> A possibility is to declare this version final and release 3.9.1 in a
>> month.
>> Or we can wait a week and declare it final.
>
> I'd argue for waiting a week then declaring it final.
>
> You've got a release candidate (or gamma). Release unless there's
> a critical bug. So no more fixes unless someone finds a bug that's
> worth waiting a few more weeks.
>
> i.e. relax, and ask people to test.

Exactly; think of this as RC1, watch the reports and if all seems  
reasonable after a week, relabel it.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Resistance is useless!  (If << 1 ohm)