[Crash (Un)Reproducibility] [Was: Re: [ANN] 7061 = Squeak 3.9 final]

Giovanni Corriga giovanni at corriga.net
Tue Sep 26 08:23:23 UTC 2006


Il giorno lun, 25/09/2006 alle 20.13 -0400, Milan Zimmermann ha scritto:
> On 2006 September 25 17:26, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
> > Il giorno lun, 25/09/2006 alle 13.42 -0700, Brad Fuller ha scritto:
> > > stephane ducasse wrote:
> <<snip>>
> > >
> > > The code is in the mantis defect that is 100% reproducible on my PC. I
> > > think it's easy to duplicate or make other PCs crash.
> >
> > I can reproduce it on my system, (Fedora Core 5, 3.9-7 vm, 3.8 image).
> 
> Guys,
> 
> Could you paste the exact output of "squeak -version"? - The reason I am 
> saying it is that this _does_ work on my SuSE 9.3. I think there are multiple 
> 3.9-7 VMs, and we already saw significant performance difference between 3.9 
> VM version built on RedHat (i think) and Ian's version (on another thread 
> this week named something like Squeak is slooow):

Ok, here's mine:

[gcorriga at rincewind ~]$ squeak -version
3.9-7 #1 Thu May 18 12:06:33 CEST 2006 gcc 4.1.0
Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]
Linux rincewind 2.6.16-1.2111_FC5.stk16 #1 Mon May 8 10:49:23 EDT 2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
default plugin location: /usr/lib/squeak/3.9-7/*.so

could this be related to the use of gcc 4.x?

	Giovanni




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list