On 2006 September 26 15:45, stephane ducasse wrote:
> Another point: look at the effort of the squeak-dev image.
> Is it not great to see all the package maintainer pushing in the same
> direction?
> I want to thanks them all for that.
>
> 	Yes it is cool so let us do it more often because this is the way
> that we will get
> 	a better system
>
> So if you want to do something for the community, may be
> paste all the packages on a wiki page and report the broken ones and
> try to notify the owners.

Does putting a BUG report on Mantis such as "this error happens in 3.9 
(details)" against a Squeak Package (e.g. RemoteFrameBuffer) produce email 
the package maintainers? If it does not, it could be a useful addition, if it 
does, perhaps we should be just reporting such 3.9 incompatibility on Mantis 
(I added one earlier, I am not sure how to contact the maintainer)

Milan


>
> Stef
>
> On 26 sept. 06, at 21:36, Benoit St-Jean wrote:
> > Bien le bonjour monsieur Ducasse!
> >
> > Non je n'ai pas encore porté de "package" sur 3.9.  De
> > ce que j'ai cru comprendre sur le "mailing list",
> > cette version a encore quelques petits problèmes.
> > Mais dès que j'ai une version 3.9 stable (ou 4.0), je
> > vais m'y mettre!
> >
> > J'encourage tout le monde à essayer de "loader"
> > quelques "packages" dans une image vierge...  C'est
> > étonnant de voir à quel point plusieurs "packages"
> > sont "broken" (à moins que ce soit l'image de 3.9).