[SqueakSource] SSFilesystem woes

James Foster Smalltalk at JGFoster.net
Fri Aug 3 12:37:37 UTC 2007


Michael Rueger wrote:
> Isn't it time we add a real database backend to squeak source? Saving 
> the image isn't a good solution either, one disk full or similar 
> incident and there goes your entire database. 
Even better, is to run Squeak Source inside a real object database 
server. No filesystem nonsense, no object-relational mapping struggles, 
full ACID behavior, etc. See http://seaside.gemstone.com/ss/ for an 
in-production example.

James



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list