[SqueakSource] SSFilesystem woes
James Foster
Smalltalk at JGFoster.net
Fri Aug 3 12:37:37 UTC 2007
Michael Rueger wrote:
> Isn't it time we add a real database backend to squeak source? Saving
> the image isn't a good solution either, one disk full or similar
> incident and there goes your entire database.
Even better, is to run Squeak Source inside a real object database
server. No filesystem nonsense, no object-relational mapping struggles,
full ACID behavior, etc. See http://seaside.gemstone.com/ss/ for an
in-production example.
James
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|