Why does it need "rename" specifically?  If change sets reliably show every
class creation, update and deletion then applying a change set with a class
rename will still work.  You just wont be able to see as clearly that it was
a rename (i.e. rename is just delete one thing then add a new thing that is
exactly the same but with a new name).

On 8/4/07, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Last time I had to look for such changes I'm pretty sure that class
> > name and shape changes were in the changes.log as DoIts. However I
> > just ran a quick test and it seems that *nothing* got written out; if
> > I didn't make a mistake then that would be A Very Bad Thing.
>
> That class renames don't get logged in the changes is a very very old
> bug. It bugged me already years ago and I can't even remember a time
> when it worked.
>
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070804/dc862896/attachment.htm