Andreas Raab a écrit :

> 
> Indeed, one would hope so. Although, I'm not sure if we agree on what 
> "two-way process" means here ;-) To me, it means that those projects 
> both contribute as well as benefit. As it stands, it appears that most 
> projects don't benefit at all from "mainstream" Squeak. I can't speak 

May be it will be easier to see Squeak.org not as a place of innovation 
but as a place to gather fixes, improvements, innovations coming from 
other places as Croquet, Sophie, Seaside,... I think nobody working in 
mainstream Squeak is paid for that, so it is not possible to expect from 
there direct huge improvement and fast reactivity you can get from 
people working in corporate and dedicated to this task.
In the other it will be disappointing if improvement/fixes done in 
Sophie or Seaside forks can not flow easily in Croquet and vis-versa.
Organising free software community is probably very difficult, but if 
well organised the benefice is huge for everyone using the software.