On Aug 29, 2007, at 11:04 PM, bradallenfuller at yahoo.com wrote:

>>> Another thought: I always wanted to be able to have _any_ object  
>>> that communicates to the
>>> user to be a morph. This would be any graphic object, but also  
>>> any video object, audio object,
>>> anything that deals with the senses of the user. What do you  
>>> think about this idea?
>>
>
>> This is already so. see #asMorph message :)
>> You can build up any morph(s) for representing your object.
>
> I'm not referring to building a graphic object to represent a sound  
> (for instance), I want to manipulate a sound or video just like I  
> can a morph graphic object.

I'm interested...

What do you mean by this?  Do you want any object to be able to  
provide a default graphical representation of itself and its  
properties?  Do you want to inherit the morphs ability to #step?  Do  
you want to give non-visual objects like sounds a position so that  
you can hear them pan back and forth?

Josh