Time seconds in 3.10
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sat Dec 8 22:10:32 UTC 2007
Keith Hodges wrote:
> Andreas Raab wrote:
>> The difference appears to be in Time>>now which for some inexplicable
>> reason now includes a milliseconds value. Albeit incorrectly I might
>> add since the msecs clock is not actually synchronized with the
>> seconds clock. Looks like a regression to me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
> It is "actually" synchronised.
Oh, I see. You're keeping an offset manually. I was referring to
primMsecsClock which has no relation (at least on Windows) to the value
obtained by primTotalSeconds. Do you know if this adjustment will
survive standby/suspend and power cycling?
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|