respondsTo: bug
Tom Phoenix
rootbeer at redcat.com
Tue Dec 18 19:14:59 UTC 2007
On 12/18/07, Doug Edmunds <dae at douglasedmunds.com> wrote:
> (3 @ 4) respondsTo: #<=. "Squeak reports this as false"
Could you double-check that, please? Maybe it's different in your
release of Squeak, but I get a true value.
> Trying other methods for Point, I get many similar 'false' results when
> sending 'respondsTo:' to Point (but I also get many correct results).
>
> ie.
>
> Point respondsTo: #abs. "false"
You're sending that message to Point, a class, rather than to an
instance of Point. The class doesn't respond to abs, but an instance
should.
(3 at 2.5) respondsTo: #abs. "true"
(3 at 2.5) respondsTo: #basicNew. "false"
Hope this helps!
--Tom Phoenix
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|