Making Squeak more accessible and used - reversing the
trend
Bill Schwab
BSchwab at anest.ufl.edu
Sun Feb 4 15:38:41 UTC 2007
Brad,
I want to "perpetuate" vertical apps because my users need them and
therefore I need to create them. Communicating between them can be as
simple as using sockets. Given that I have apps (vertical or otherwise)
on geographically separated machines, that's pretty much a wash anyway.
BTW, I get more than prototyping: I get the ability to
profile/refactor/iterate until I have something that frequently
out-performs a mainstream effort, and I get an OO system that can "tell
me where it hurts" any time an error occurs. That's a lot of bang for
the user's buck.
In summary, I want to use Smalltalk, and like it or not, I will run on
top of things like Windows, Mac OS or Linux for a long time to come.
The question is whether or not Squeak is a candidate development
platform.
We seem to agree (to put it mildly<g>) about the level of cleanup that
should occur in moving to 3.10. That's a start.
Bill
Brad Fuller brad at bradfuller.com
Sun Feb 4 02:09:16 UTC 2007
> I continue to think the community is really missing the point on a few
> fundamental topics. Some think the only route to success is to get
> developers to use Squeak to churn out native-widget apps for end
users;
> others fire back with things like there should be no OS, no difference
> between users and developers, and other idealistic beliefs. All are
> bickering, to the detriment of Squeak.
Gee... I haven't seen any bickering. I think the arguments have been
fruitful and interesting.
>
> Our goal should be to collaborate on making both approaches, and
others,
> possible!
Why would one want to continue to perpetuate the development of vertical
applications - of which it is difficult to communicate between (except
w/o even more vertical methods of communicating)? I see only one
advantage of developing OS-native apps in Squeak and that's Smalltalk's
prototyping ability. A capability that you can also get with other
languages. Unfortunately, the user misses the true power of the
Smalltalk environment.
<text removed>
> The modularization effort provides a wonderful opportunity to give
> Squeak a frame-up restoration for 3.10 and beyond. I continue to
hope
> that we will take a collective deep breath and clean up the modules as
> they go into the next image; now is the time.
Amen
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: bills at anest4.anest.ufl.edu
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|