Lex Spoon napsal(a):
> Gilrandir <gilrandir at centrum.cz> writes:
>> Hi all,
>> i'm looking for a decent module system for Squeak and i'm playing with
>> Classboxes - they seem to be ideal - it's still pure Smalltalk, they
>> work together with Traits, but there seems to be something broken: in
>> Classbox>>scope is an attempt to instantiate a class named
>> Environment, which is nowhere to be found
> 
> 
> I don't think Classboxes is maintained.  For experimentation, you
> should dig up the correct older version of Squeak for it -- does
> anyone know what that would be?  If you want to continue using them
> beyond experimentation, then either you need to use it with the old
> version of Squeak, or you need to update it personally.
> 
I'm pretty sure Classboxes is not maintained anymore, though in my 
opinion, it't "the module system for Squeak, done right" and i'd like to 
test to use it myself. I don't know which version of Squeak is the right 
one, and i wanted to update it fo 3.9 - but i'm not able to infer, which 
class should i use instead of Environment or how to work around this.

> 
> By the way, there are some other module-related tools that are
> actively maintained.  Monticello is a great for managing code given
> the current Squeak design; it won't prevent clashes between packages,
> but at least it will tell you when they happen.  Package universes is
> my toolkit for helping people manage sets of mutually compatible
> packages; given such a toolkit, the need for a good module system is
> lessened.
> 
I kind of really like the Squeaks' module and packaging tools, but it 
just doesn't feel right to me - i don't like to depend of any tools of 
this kind, without the "real" low-level (or first-order, i'm not sure 
how to put this in english) facility backing them.

> 
> -Lex
> 
Though i'm not looking for a solution rigth now, but just for a way to 
get Classboxes going, thank you :)

Viktor Svub