Andreas Raab wrote:
> Brad Fuller wrote:
>> * All Squeak images (except version 1.1) are subject to the Apple
>> Computer, Inc. Software License shown at:
>> http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/
>
> All Squeak images *including* version 1.1 are available under Squeak-L.
>
>> * Squeak 1.1 has moved to the APSL - the Apple Public Source License
>> (http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/2.0.txt)
>
> *In addition* to being available under Squeak-L, Squeak 1.1 has also 
> been relicensed by Apple under *both* APSL 2.0 *as well as* Apache 
> 2.0. Viewpoints Research negotiated both agreements.
>
>> * The community/SqF Board is gathering authors to be part of a new
>> licensing scheme for the current(?) and newer(?) Squeak images. That
>> license is the MIT license. I gather that this text is correct for the
>> MIT license:
>>
>> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
>>
>> Is this all true? I have some follow on questions after this is 
>> confirmed.
>
> With the above corrections, yes.
Just to be clear here, Andreas. New images are to be under the MIT license?


>
>> Is there a person that is "in charge of" or coordinating the licensing
>> issue?
>
> Kim Rose (VPRI) and Craig Latta (SqF) are coordinating this effort.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>
>


-- 
brad fuller
www.bradfuller.com
+1 (408) 799-6124