Have you tried TraitsOmniBrowser (http://www.squeaksource.com/ 
TraitsOmniBrowser.html)? Also, the OmniBrowser in the image has basic  
support for Traits.
Of course the tools are not perfect. Instead of helping to improve  
the situation people tend to complain. Unfortunately this will not  
bring us forward. But hey, its not that important, is it?

Adrian

BTW, Monticello supports Traits too


On Feb 21, 2007, at 11:06 , danil osipchuk wrote:

>
> I would like to use traits (will start making an app with a complex  
> domain
> model) but the tool support is not sufficient. I think it is not a  
> fair
> claim that we've got Traits if we have no tools :(
>
> regards,
>  Danil
>
>
> Göran Krampe wrote:
>>
>>
>> But... that doesn't mean that I advocate Squeak to stand still
>> language-wise. I love the fact we got Traits - even though it  
>> hasn't taken
>> off yet AFAIK - anyone using them btw?
>>
>> regards, Göran
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Squeak- 
> Foundation-Board-2007-Candidates-tf3253392.html#a9078181
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>