election details *PLEASE READ*
stephane ducasse
stephane.ducasse at free.fr
Fri Feb 23 21:03:38 UTC 2007
On 21 févr. 07, at 09:24, Todd Blanchard wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Alan Lovejoy wrote:
>
>> Your comment made me think of the difference in attitude between
>> French
>> speakers and English Speakers.
>
> I don't find this analogy particularly compelling. I don't think
> people are really trying to keep Smalltalk 'pure'. I think they're
> trying to find ways to improve it. Lots of things have been tried
> - multiple inheritance, prototype based vs class based models,
> access control wrappers, etc... The cool thing is you can make it
> what you want already. The trick is getting your nifty thing
> adopted into the standard package.
>
>> Other programming languages have been stealing from Smalltalk for
>> decades.
>> It's time we returned the favor.
>
> I'm in favor of that - but honestly, there hasn't been a lot worth
> stealing from the mainstream.
>
> I have been looking at erlang recently and find some of the
> parallel/process/queue constructs interesting and would love to try
> to bring some of that over and try building a high performance web
> server based on those patterns.
>
> And then, of course, there are interesting technologies that have
> nothing to do with the language but would make a great addition to
> the platform. Like Supple http://www.cs.washington.edu/ai/supple/
> - a really nifty demo I saw last year.
Sounds really interesting for small devices. Thanks for the pointer.
>
> So there is lots of great stuff to steal - but not much of it from
> the mainstream languages - they mostly seem to ape the last
> generation and then take a little lunge in the direction of Smalltalk.
>
> -Todd Blanchard
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|