Well you bring up a good point.  I think the first thing we need to do is 
get into a fully packaged (via universes, or something like that) world 
where such a tool only need look at package dependencies, not every single 
method/class.


>From: "Pavel Krivanek" <squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: "Inteligent" Shrink?
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:05:20 +0100
>
>Hi,
>
>I played with this idea of automatical image segmentation but the
>fastest, safest and maybe the only possible way now is to do that all
>by hand. The better way to create specialized images is IMHO from
>bottom. So we should simply continue in started modularization and
>packaging effort.
>
>Cheers,
>-- Pavel
>
>On 2/22/07, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi <glpunzi at zyoconsulting.com> wrote:
>>I don't know if others thinks like me, but I think something like this
>>could be intereseting for prepare a ready for end-users image (without
>>70MB of size)
>>
>>Something like this could have "don't delete develop tools" for example,
>>but all the packages don't used, disappear from this image.
>>
>>En Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:47:12 +0100, Göran Krampe <goran at krampe.se>
>>escribió:
>>
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> Imagine this.
>> >>
>> >> You select one or various categories and "Intelligent Shrink" browse 
>>all
>> >> the image searching all the objects thath the selected categories 
>>uses.
>> >> If
>> >> a categorie is not use or not will use it for our selected categories
>> >> then
>> >> erase it.
>> >>
>> >> Example:
>> >>    I create a "set" of objects, and use objects from Kernel, Morphic
>> >> etc..
>> >> But no object uses Monticello. Then, "Intelligent Shrink" may delete 
>>all
>> >> Monticello's class not used.
>> >>
>> >> Is this possible on Squeak?
>> >
>> > I guess there are a whole bunch of ways to do such an analysis (that is
>> > more or less probably to be correct), MudPie springs to mind of course.
>> >
>> > Can't give you an SM-link right now because the nameservers for
>> > squeak.org
>> > seems to be unreachable right now - have no idea. I can't verify if SM 
>>is
>> > up or down because I don't have the IP of squeak.org in my head.
>> >
>> > regards, Göran
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Giuseppe Luigi Punzi - Consultor
>>
>>         :: ZYO Consulting ::
>>email: glpunzi at zyoconsulting.com
>>tlfno: +34 675 145 912
>>web: http://www.zyoconsulting.co
>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find what you need at prices you’ll love. Compare products and save at MSN® 
Shopping. 
http://shopping.msn.com/default/shp/?ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24102&tcode=T001MSN20A0701