"Inteligent" Shrink?

Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Mon Feb 26 09:05:00 UTC 2007


On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:43:18 +0100, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote:
> Hi JJ,
>
> J J escribió:
>>> From: "Giuseppe Luigi Punzi" <glpunzi at zyoconsulting.com>
>>> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>>> list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>> To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers
>>> list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>> Subject: Re: "Inteligent" Shrink?
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:23:26 +0100
>>>
>>> "Spoon way" is the oposite to "Intelligent Shrink" ideas.
>>>
>>> Spoon Way = Add all as you want.
>>> IS = Erase all you don't need.
>>
>>> As I said, If 3.10 will work with modules, and you can start with a
>>> basic  (basic=minimun for start and add packages) image and add all
>>> you need,  then this is unnecesary.
>>
>> I disagree with this. I would always want an "Intelligent Shrink"
>> because I prefer to work with an image that has everything in, but if I
>> were to make something to deploy to an end user I would want to break
>> out just the app I am giving them.  And I don't want to do that  
>> manually.
>
> Well, you are right.
>
> There are some page on the swiki or other web where you can share ideas
> or bountys?. For example, I (and others as I can see) would like
> something like this, but I don't have the experience for do it.

You might want to look at an existing class (invented by Ted Kaehler),

- http://ftp.squeak.org/1.23/1.22-1.23%20FileIns/SystemTracer.st

HTH.

/Klaus

> Cheers.
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list