Me too, a few weeks ago. Very odd to see it for the first time!
Like Brad, only one method different between the two.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Bert
> Freudenberg
> Sent: 26 February 2007 8:47 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: 2 references to class with the same name
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 26, 2007, at 20:46 , Brad Fuller wrote:
> 
> > I searched for the answer to this, but mostly found how to deal  
> > with instances and obsolete classes. Somehow, I ended up with 2 two  
> > classes with the same name, and the class is not obsolete.
> >
> > If I look at the hierarchy of it's (their) superclass  
> > (PRStructuresWidget)  there are two classes shown:
> >
> > 	PRSearchWidget #('searchText' 'items')
> > 	PRSearchWidget #('searchText')
> >
> > PRSearchWidget #('searchText' 'items') is the current "real" class.  
> > Somehow PRSearchWidget #('searchText') got in there, which I don't  
> > want. I don't know how to get rid of it. Anyone point me to the  
> > right documentation on this?  Maybe if I file out the current one,  
> > then remove the class?
> 
> Funny you should mention this. I saw the same thing in about three  
> images lately. I have no idea where it comes from. My hunch is  
> Monticello, but I have no evidence to back this up.
> 
> In all cases I found that one or even two older version of a class  
> were still in the subclasses list of its superclass. That is, in the  
> browser you could see several subclasses with the same name. Only one  
> of these is the "real" one which is also registered in Smalltalk.
> 
> I do not hava a bad image now, but to find these, the following  
> should work:
> 
> bad := OrderedCollection new.
> Smalltalk allClassesDo: [:ea | bad addAll: (ea subclasses reject:  
> [:cls | cls isMeta or: [cls == (Smalltalk at: cls name)]])].
> bad
> 
> To remove them, try this:
> 
> bad do: [:cls | cls superclass removeSubclass: cls]
> 
> Hmm, has anybody else seen this?
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> 
> 
>