Hi Todd,

	I read your post. It's very nice one can read experiences like this.
I'm liking this posting practice in the community. After reading your post I
think glorp is too much for me by now. Perhaps I will wait for the
ActiveRecord you mention.

	For a prototype now I'm using as a "db" a singleton with a
Dictionary wich can be downloaded (and uploaded) serialized by sixx.

	In a project like this I want to keep development light even to
formalize persistence.

	Do you have experiences to share in this line?

	cheers,

Sebastian 


-----Mensaje original-----
De: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre de Todd
Blanchard
Enviado el: Lunes, 22 de Enero de 2007 21:14
Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Asunto: Re: Load OmniBase in Squeak

I just moved a fairly substantial app off of OmniBase and onto GLORP/
PostgreSQL.

I wrote a blog entry about it:

http://www.blackbagops.net/?p=94

also, I don't have anything good to say about the author of OmniBase and his
"support". He demands money to help you, then doesn't follow through after
you pay him.

Happy to be off of OmniBase.

On Jan 21, 2007, at 4:54 AM, Sebastian Sastre wrote:

>  OK, I'll give it a chance. I'll read some tutorials first.
> Any introductory (to glorp) reads references you want to give me are 
> welcome.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre de 
> Ramon Leon Enviado el: Sábado, 20 de Enero de 2007 21:15
> Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Asunto: Re: Load OmniBase in Squeak
>
> Todd Blanchard wrote:
>> It is an omen, don't do it man.
>
> LMAO... I think that means "use Glorp" dude, listen to the Todd!
>
>
>