Could we fix the web site
geert.wl.claes at gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 23:45:42 UTC 2007
I would say someone from the squeakfoundation could register squeak.org at
openusability.org, but I am not sure whether they are that keen on my
suggestion as you are Jason. I reckon if the seaside.st and squeak.org
websites had more of a great looking, web 2.0 presence (whatever that might
be) it could only be more beneficial for the smalltalk community.
Jason Rogers-4 wrote:
> I think this is a good idea... Anyone want to lead that? G?
> On 1/21/07, GeertC <geert.wl.claes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> "I want to be **proud** to put a link on http:/www.squeak.org" I skimmed
>> through this discussion and noticed a difference in opinion as to what
>> Squeak home page should look like and contain. The web site already looks
>> heaps better after Brad Fuller's work. I reckon it still lacks some
>> though Why don't we ask the people at openusability.org for their
>> usability and design opinion and let the Squeak experts here focus on
>> itself? g
>> View this message in context: Re: Could we fix the web site
>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Jason Rogers
> "Where there is no vision, the people perish..."
> Proverbs 29:18
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-we-fix-the-web-site-tf2931405.html#a8671337
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Squeak-dev