stephane.ducasse at free.fr
Sun Jul 1 19:25:27 UTC 2007
>> I don't wish image go blow . And I think masters time is important
>> to waste
>> remembering only a particular Squeak is different.
> I think it is always worth to also look at other Smalltalk
> implementations. No Smalltalk that I know of puts all its image
> related functionality into Smalltalk the root namespace. They all have
> something like ObjectMemory, ObjectMachine, etc.
Indeed.... but they should be all fools :)
PS: I'm not happy with SmalltalkImage (may be with Smalltalk pointing
to it, yes).
But indeed you are right. Other people faced this problem and they
found an OO solution
to the problem.
More information about the Squeak-dev