>>
> Sorry, phillipe, I don't agree. I like the open source way of doing
> things (I'm doing it for over 10 years now) but there are problems.
> Taking seaside as an example is not a good comparsion. There are
> 3 to 4 developers in average which contribute to the repository with
> one unofficial leader which is Lukas.

Basically you have a small domain and four excellent guys. So this is  
counting too. :)

> That is more the way a project
> is organized from the top. As long as very few people are contributing
> and one which is reviewing the changes and integrates them into the
> trunk everything is fine. Furthermore the seaside developers are more
> open to change seaside the way they like.
> I think you need just a few more developers changing code slightly
> more often that code reviewing and integration is rendered impossible.
> This leads very quick to a situation where code reviewing is fulltime
> job and I doubt anyone is willing to take it.

yeap


> If there is nobody which
> does this work it leads to a situation where each developer is his
> own branch including from others only what he needs/likes.
>
> And we have a lot of squeak branches right now.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
>
> Norbert
>
>
>