2007/7/4, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>:
>
>
>
> El 7/4/07 2:09 PM, "Philippe Marschall" <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> > The bug, like many other actually has a fix included. All it would
> > take from a responsible person is to have a look at it and either take
> > it in or reject it. Not just simply ignore it.
> >
> > Philippe
>
>
> Blaming Craig don't help.

I thought he was responsible for maintaining Morphic. I was mistaken
as previously pointed out. However his work on in the board and on
Spoon has nothing directly to do with the way Squeak packages are
maintained which is what this thread is about  (at least to me).

> He do Spoon and many people here feel in the long time Squeak become Squeak.
>
> Now you should blame me, as part of release team harvesting Mantis.

The way I understand Squeak Teams [1] they should be responsible for
maintaining their packages. Am I mistaken again?

> But before you complain, should read
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5919 The 3.10 release
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5975 History of the 3.10 release
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5934 List of Mantis issues ready to be
> included in 3.10
>
> The 3.10 should do not have any red test (7121 don't have) no failures (have
> some , but are know and we are working on).
> Off course, Fix or ENH any targeted to 3.10 should have test.
> 5222 don't have test, so should be automatic rejected.
>
> The reporter is renggli. As I have deep respect for he, I try the bug and if
> I could reproduce the bug and the fix,

I can reproduce the bug and the fixes works for me. Again this
discussion should not happen here but on Mantis.

> maybe you are lucky
>
> and I put into updates.

No way! This is exactly the problem I wanted to point out. I am not a
maintainer of Morphic and don't want to become one. Same with
Monticello. Again,  I am not making accusations or proposals just
pointing out how I see things.

Philippe

[1] http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams/

> Edgar
>
>
>
>