we hope with damien to
	- get MC2 usable for everybody
	- have a good documentation (white paper)

But now I'm running to find a flat in the other side of france :)
Boxing after unboxing.... ooops packing after unpacking... this is life.

Stef
	
On 7 juil. 07, at 04:00, Keith Hodges wrote:

> Dear Avi and all,
>> For Monticello 2, on the other hand, we've released plenty of
>> information, tried to open discussion many times, asked for  
>> volunteers
> I am not sure what you mean by plenty of information though. There  
> is source code. Long ago I concluded that the "Avi" definition of  
> "plenty of information" differs greatly from mine. How about some  
> white papers?
>> at several points, but never released something that people could
>> actually use for their daily work.  Result: apart from Damien who
>> recently got some funding to work on it, we've had no response
>> whatsoever.
> This is not strictly true.
>
> In the spirit of incremental, and hence hopefully adoptable  
> progress. There is a version of Monticello1 which has SystemEditor  
> from MC2 in it, ready to use. It only took one day to put this in,  
> I did it about 6 weeks ago, and it is ready to roll when  
> SystemEditor works.


keith I'm confused. Is systemeditor working or not?

>> This despite the fact that MC2 is a much better and more ambitious
>> design than any of the prior versions of MC.
> So we are ready to go when SystemEditor from MC2 is ready.   
> Unfortunately I dont know enough about the compilation/class  
> composition of squeak to fix it. I will also say that SystemEditor  
> is a really impressive bit of code, and I dont feel in any way  
> qualified to contribute to it.
>
> best regards
>
> Keith
>
>