On Jul 10, 2007, at 19:31 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

> Bert Freudenberg a écrit :
>> On Jul 10, 2007, at 16:20 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
>>> So, are there any reason the download link at the top right  
>>> should not point to the squeak-dev regularly-updated and useful- 
>>> for-developer image?
>>>
>>> After all, if we want the Squeak community to grow with  
>>> developer, we also want to make Squeak more appealing for  
>>> developer, don't you?
>>> Or are  there any reason to not do so?
>>>
>>> And for educative use, people should just be pointed to  
>>> SqueakLand, right?
>> What's the point of having a Squeak release then?
>
> I don't see the point. Having a more user centric vision does not  
> break the release process, does it?

Well, you implied that everyone except the people interested in  
education should use the dev image because it is "regularly-updated  
and useful-for-developer". That sounds like nobody is interested in  
the official Squeak release. And watching Edgar struggle all alone  
with 3.10 you may even be right. Hence my question - what's the point  
of having a release nobody wants? Why not make the release be as cool  
and inviting and useful as possible?

- Bert -