Free primitive indexes
tim at rowledge.org
Sat Jul 14 00:58:20 UTC 2007
OK, you got me there. That's probably the only good reason you could
possibly have a need for a prim number!
I suggest using 169, next to primitiveCopyObject - at least for now.
You will, of course, be making your design so nicely factored and
intelligible that it could be changed at any time without causing a
problem, won't you :-)
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Strange OpCodes: HALT: No-Op
More information about the Squeak-dev