Yes, in this case, change ANSI.

And also have all the Smalltalk implementations add a comment to the
#peekFor: method stating the Smalltalk community has decided the standard is
wrong, and in conflict with established practice.

--Alan

<Nicolas Cellier>
James Foster a écrit :
> Actually, in this case I'd suggest that we change the standard! In
> each of the six Smalltalk dialects I have available (Dolphin,
> GemStone, Squeak, VisualAge, VisualSmalltalk, VisualWorks) the following
returns true:
>
> 	((ReadStream on: 'abc') peekFor: $a; next) = $b.
>
> This makes some sense. If you get back what you expect, why ask for it
> again?
>
> Is there an ANSI errata? If not, could we have a wiki page available
> for such? I have several things to add...
>
> James Foster
>

Totally agree, change ANSI
</Nicolas Cellier>