PositionnableStream>>skip: not standard
Damien Cassou
damien.cassou at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 11:19:54 UTC 2007
Another one :-)
In the standard, #skip: should explicetly not raise an error if #skip:
would go after the end. It is said that "A number of objects equal to
the lesser of amount and the size of the receiver's future sequence
values are removed..."
Same question: what do we choose ? If you have other Smalltalk
implementations at hand, what did they choose ?
--
Damien Cassou
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|