On Mar 2, 2007, at 15:57 , Damien Cassou wrote:

> 2007/3/2, Jon Hylands <jon at huv.com>:
>> Whether it *should* work this way is another question, but it  
>> certainly
>> seems consistent...
>
> Sure, the result is consistent with the implementation :-) But do we
> really want that meaning ?

It's a very sensible definition of "close to":

{
1.1 closeTo: 1.0.
10.1 closeTo: 10.0.
100.1 closeTo: 100.0.
1000.1 closeTo: 1000.0.
}

#(false false false true)

- Bert -