DEADLINE for Squeak contributor agreements: 1 May 2007

Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Thu Mar 22 13:16:19 UTC 2007


On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:05:26 +0100, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> I thought this was interesting.
>
> http://on-ruby.blogspot.com/2007/01/abandoned-projects-bus-proofing-and.html

I understand and letting another admin, who is under control of the  
community, make such a decision is a good idea.

But making a decision depending on an outdated or (fraudulent) bouncing  
email address is not.

/Klaus

> Ron
>
>> From: Stéphane Rollandin
>>
>> Craig Latta wrote:
>> >      Since copyright persists after death in many jurisdictions, the
>> > current stance is that we will not include those contributions without
>> > some other indication as to their licensing terms.
>>
>> that's sad.
>>
>> I would not like than, when I die, my public work becomes unavailable
>> just because I'm not here anymore to sign a paper. That's another kind
>> of death.
>>
>> Shall we now all carry an "intellectual property donor" card so that we
>> can drop dead anytime without fear that our fellow human beings feel
>> obliged to forget what we have done ?
>>
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>
>
>
>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list