On 3/25/07, Dan Ingalls <Dan at squeakland.org> wrote:
> Possibly, and certainly in the bulk of the system it's frequently the case that the person who *really* wrote the method has been overwritten by someone who may have done nothing more than reformat it, so what is provided by this tally is closer to misinformation than information.
>
Another good argument for a Squeak Code Conservatory (or Museum :-)).
Maybe a nice summer vacation project...

(what I mean with this is a browseable, queryable (Mantis) database
containing all source code of all versions back to Squeak 1.0).