Ok let me know when you are ready.
Do you publish the version to the 3.9 squeaksource repository?
I do not expect that the fix to MC will help because the root of the  
problems
are deep. Atomic loading in the system written in itself and  
modifying itself is difficult.

Stef

> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> keith
>>
>> if you issue 3.9.1 may be this should not only be a list of fixes  
>> but creates new packages and
>> be added to the scriptloader that we used for 3.9. This way this  
>> will be consistent with 3.9.
>>
>> Once you have a list of fixes I could try to produce a new image  
>> with the packages versioned in the 3.9
>> repository and a cs in the update stream.
>>
>> Stef
> Dear Stef,
>
> This was the plan. For the plan see http://squeak310.pbwiki.com
>
> This list of fixes is used to generate 3.9.1alpha-test via a  
> script. Then all the changed packages are updated to a repository,  
> and loading these packages into 3.9 is used to generate 3.9.1beta- 
> release-candidate. I would appreciate help with the latter part of  
> the process which I have not done before. I hope that the fixes to  
> monticello (still in progress) will make this MUCH easier. I also  
> hope that it can be automated, so we can iterate a couple of times  
> if need be.
>
> best regards
>
> Keith
>
>
>