2007/5/7, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>
>  Dear Craig, Jerome, the board et al.
>
>  Personally, I'm against people deciding on their own to make
> releases with official-sounding names.
>
>  It does not make sense to use any other name for this project than 3.9.1
> for the following reason.
>
>  The question that I am putting to the community, as reflected in the
> question I put to squeak-dev, concerning what fixes people want to see in
> 3.9.1, is this:
>
>  "What does the community want to see in 3.9.1 if/when it exists?"

- TTFontCache fix
- working MCC
- non-transparent SM
- Integer >> #readFrom: fix

>  If the question was, "what do you want to see in 3.9plus", then the answer
> would be "anything you like its your image", and that entirely misses the
> whole point.
>
>  I have put together a forum for discussion and developed some of the tools
> for discussing, planning, specifying, automatically generating, and testing
> a minor release. The content of that release remains entirely open for
> discussion. The password for the site is "viewpoints" so you can dive
> straight in.
>
>  I am not presenting the community with a release saying this is 3.9.1 take
> it or rename it. Rather I am presenting the community with an extremely
> embryonic process ready to be applied. This process has been sitting there
> doing nothing for a few months, so lets use it!
>
>  May I reiterate the content is open for discussion, and I think that the
> process is also as visible as it can possibly be. You dont even have to wait
> for me to generate a build you can do it youself from the command line.
>
>  So then,  what if anything would you like to see in an official squeak
> 3.9.1?
>
>  best regards
>
>  Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>