Towards 3.9.1 What's going on here?

stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse at free.fr
Mon May 7 06:57:31 UTC 2007


>> A
>> large section of Keith's plan is to change and improve
>> Monticello.
>
> I tell he what Monticello have owners.
> Very good Squeakers.
> And as I tell in separate mail, Monticello 2 is ready for doing a  
> release
> with ?

no

>> 2) Is there a simple and faster way to do release steps?
> I always said what old style change sets, but is not what we agree  
> use on
> 3.10.
> Steph said what is the only way what all could discover  
> shortcomings in
> Monticello.
>
> One more time, in Mantis I have fixes/enhancements what could go  
> into 3.10
> via cs but no via Monticello.

what are the problems you encounter?

> No need of a complete release for solve this.
> Only what need is take 3.10, modify Installer mantis  
> createRBforBug: 6089
>
> When have a .mcz with the change what 3.10 could load via Monticello
> Browser, I do a motion for give a medal to winner.
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list