Ah thanks.  I am actually looking around at all the different ways people do 
this concept of "module/namespace" to see what the best possible solution 
is.  I would like something that is more advanced then just playing tricks 
with the selectors and the tools, but not something that changes the 
language substantially.

That is, I think the work you're doing is very good and interesting, but I'm 
not yet convinced about locking smalltalk down to such a level.  Perhaps 
that is the way to go, we'll see, but one must keep in mind that there is a 
slider bar: on one side is "user friendly-ness" and on the other side is 
"security".  The more secure you are, the less user friendly.  The more user 
friendly, the less secure.  It is a tricky thing to balance properly, and 
for the moment I consider the domain of the application developer, not the 
language.  But who knows, maybe you will change my mind. :)


>From: "Michael van der Gulik" <mikevdg at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: Dan Ingalls' Environments package
>Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:16:12 +1200
>
>On 5/8/07, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Anyone used Dan's Environments package: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5611
>>
>
>I'm trying to solve all the same problems with my Namespaces package:
>
>http://www.squeaksource.com/SecureSqueak.
>
>You'll need to email me directly for installation directions. It's 
>currently
>still in a state of flux.
>
>Michael.


>

_________________________________________________________________
Catch suspicious messages before you open them—with Windows Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_protection_0507