>From: "Sebastian Sastre" <ssastre at seaswork.com>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "'The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list'"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: RE: Smoothing Squeak's usability barriers
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:31:46 -0300
>
>JJ,
>
>	yes, they are, and they are very very good, but you don't think that
>an attitude like that is beign some kind of conformist? I mean, to find 
>that
>reasonable is to find reasonable the fact of leaving just as they are all
>the gaps they haven't covered yet of useful things that can be done with a
>Squeak system. So let's forget conformism.

I think you misunderstand me (I'm not always clear).  I meant that I know of 
at least two people already doing it, so it seems reasonable that more 
people would want to as well.

_________________________________________________________________
Like the way Microsoft Office Outlook works? You’ll love Windows Live 
Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_outlook_0507