Is this a bug? [was Re: Morph>>changed should call super changed?]

Simon Guest simon.guest at tesujimath.org
Sun May 20 21:23:01 UTC 2007


At Tue, 15 May 2007 22:11:35 +0100,
Simon Guest wrote:
> I've created a "dependent" morph which should be updated if one of
> several others are changed.  So I called addDependent: on the morphs I
> am observing, expecting to be called back with update: via
> Object>>changed.
> 
> However, Morph>>changed overrides Object>>changed, and does not call
> super, thus stopping this from working.

As far as I can tell, this is a bug.  The fix is trivial, so I can
report it on Mantis, along with a little changeset with the fix.

But if I did this, would anything happen?  No-one seems bothered about
this issue ...

cheers,
Simon

PS: And I have a nagging suspicion that Someone Who Knows might look at
this and say, it's not a bug, that's how it's supposed to be, and this
is why ...




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list