Craig Latta wrote:
>> My question was open-ended to allow others to describe what they feel
>> would represent the best in dynabook hw.
>>     
>
>      Ah, but you said the current stuff is unacceptable in various ways,
> which to me says that you have some magnitudes in mind that *would* be
> acceptable. I always like to know where the finish line is when someone
> says we haven't reached it. (Usually it turns out that there isn't one,
> people are just never satisifed. :)
>   
I should be more accurate here. What I mean is that I haven't seen an
acceptable Dynabook. But, I do believe the hardware parts are available
today to construct such a beast. (plus, I'm never satisfied...)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070522/e972823f/attachment.htm