On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:39 , Norbert Hartl wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we are using the latter two. Isn't first solved by the other
> two?

No, it is a very different problem (but has similar symptoms). For  
details see my mail http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/ 
squeak-dev/2007-July/119023.html

> Maybe I should incorporate the first one, too.

I have seen this problem on only one server so far (but it was very  
annoying). The SqueakSource problems reported by Impara, however,  
seem like the very same problem IIRC.

Adrian

>
> Norbert
>
>> 0006581: Image freezes (background processes like Seaside make no
>> progress) and Squeak hoggs CPU
>>
>> -----
>> 0006588: Broken Semaphore>>critical: leads to frozen processes in  
>> Delay
>>
>
>> -----
>> 0006576: Delay is not thread-safe
>>
>
>
>