Squeak license situation
paolo.bonzini at lu.unisi.ch
Wed Nov 21 15:56:50 UTC 2007
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org> writes:
> Paolo> Just as a rule of thumb, the FSF does not care about copyright for
> Paolo> people who have contributed less than 10-15 lines of code.
> Does this mean "the FSF has researched the situation, and their lawyers have
> determined that the prevailing laws ignore such small contributions", or "the
> FSF has set a policy of small contributions being irrelevant"?
I don't know, but the FSF wants to be free to bump the minimum GPL
version number (for example) without violating the contributors'
copyright. They have a concept of "legally significant change", which
they describe like this.
"If a person contributes more than around 15 lines of code and/or text
that is legally significant for copyright purposes, which means we need
copyright papers for it as described above.
A change of just a few lines (less than 15 or so) is not legally
significant for copyright. A regular series of repeated changes, such as
renaming a symbol, is not legally significant even if the symbol has to
be renamed in many places. Keep in mind, however, that a series of minor
changes by the same person can add up to a significant contribution.
What counts is the total contribution of the person; it is irrelevant
which parts of it were contributed when."
I can ask the FSF guys how they came up with this rule. Maybe there is
a precedent somewhere, but IANAL and not even an American.
More information about the Squeak-dev