Parser-removeUnusedTemps enhancement

Ralph Johnson johnson at cs.uiuc.edu
Wed Oct 3 12:55:25 UTC 2007


On 10/3/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> I thought the requirement was to not break any unit tests. Requiring
> every enhancement to come with a unit test is silly.

Yes, that is the requirements.  New unit tests are nice, but not
required.  Code is more likely to be accepted faster if it comes with
new unit tests, but we'll take it case by case.

-Ralph



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list