Quick comparison of two Namespaces proposals

Jason Johnson jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 18:30:39 UTC 2007


Oh no, I'm quite serious.  The reason Java gained such market share is
because it looks similar to the C/C++ languages people felt more
comfortable.  The guy who wrote about "the next big language" even
says this kind of look is a prerequirement now to success.

On 9/22/07, Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/18/07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Again, discussion downs not to about how namespaces should behave, but
> > > to choosing appropriate and  conventional syntax for it. Personally, i
> > > don't think its really matters.
> > > Please, people, lets focus on more important things, if you don't want
> > > to flame this topic, like in previous 'pipe syntax'.
> >
> > How code looks is important.  If it wasn't then Java wouldn't be the
> > current most popular language.
> >
>
> ROFL :-D. You can't be serious about that!
>
>
> Gulik.
>
>
> --
> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list