On 10/4/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/07, goran at krampe.se <goran at krampe.se> wrote:
> >
> > This reasoning makes no real sense to me. Why would multiple levels be
> > "better"? Are we afraid of running out of namespace names? IMHO the
> > proliferation of namespaces and hierarchies of them in other languages
> > (like Java) is more based on the fact that they are used for
> > organisational purposes.
>
> Well my reasoning is simple:  we have effectively a flat namespace
> now, and it doesn't seem to be enough.  If we add just one more level
> then we increase our scale by quite a bit but you still have the
> siltation like:



<snip>

If there was anything important in the rest of your email, could you
summarise it for me? I'm not going to read the whole thing.

Gulik.

-- 
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20071004/6dc9f30c/attachment.htm