My namespace proposal described in Yet Another Try

Jason Johnson jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 17:52:57 UTC 2007


On 9/21/07, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well I have to admit, there seems to be no harm in doing Göran's
> proposal.  It's an incremental step forward that should buy us a LOT
> of time, probably as much as we'll ever need.  Also, like he said,
> does not preclude migrating to any other namespace solutions in the
> future.

But it can be harm.  Not to pick on traits, but to take it as an
example.  Have they helped?  Andreas at least doesn't think so, and we
still haven't seen conclusive evidence that they are going to help as
implemented.  If they turn out to be a bad idea how are they going to
get ripped out again?

And that's something that isn't even getting used that much.  The
namespaces will probably be used very quickly.  I'm surprised there
are no packages that depend on them already.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list