More Delay/Semaphore "fun"

Gary Chambers gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com
Mon Oct 8 10:45:49 UTC 2007


Well, we're finding that you fixes are helping a lot (maybe not 100% watertight but much better than without!).

For a more difficult challenge:

Monitor>>critical:

!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of
> Andreas Raab
> Sent: 06 October 2007 7:18 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: More Delay/Semaphore "fun"
> 
> 
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
> > On 06/10/2007, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> >> Igor Stasenko wrote:
> >>> Then the only way is to make it to handle all by VM.
> >> Maybe not quite. Check out http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6588 to
> >> see if this addresses your problem. It appears to work remarkably well
> >> for me.
> > 
> > A bit hacky approach, don't you think?
> 
> Without any doubt. But I don't see a quick solution to the problem that 
> isn't a bit of a hack. It's not clear what a VM-driven solution looks 
> like either btw.
> 
> Cheers,
>    - Andreas
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list