-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

gruntfuttuck wrote:
> How is squeak going to handle multy-core CPUs, if at all? If we see cores of
> 100 plus in the future and squeak stay as it is, I would imagine other
> languages such as erlang, will look more attractive.

Anyone followed links that Andreas gave?

	http://www.erights.org

???

There is a dissertation that addresses two fundamental problems:
- - it introduces synchronization mechanisms that are meant to escape
  from the situation where you
  - either have interference
  - or non-deterministic deadlock
  (Erlang does not solve these problems.
   The recent book about Erlang does not even mention the word "deadlock")
- - *security*

It is a point-of-view-changing reading.

It is true that it is far less mature for production quality, but taking ideas from something as
primitive as Erlang ... well, good luck.
- --
Matej Kosik
ICQ: 300133844
skype: matej_kosik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHIFcoL+CaXfJI/hgRAux5AKCy100+3z/AS3+/GhTevVW9uS8VDgCgw2e5
5yJj4MDA59uTyTXQX+3M6bQ=
=gtQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----