2007/9/3, Ramon Leon <ramon.leon at allresnet.com>:
> > I strongly disagree that this should be in the main image.
> > This would encourage code that is not ANSI compliant, and I'm
> > quite happy with my parenthesis.
> >
> > Michael.
>
> Are you saying you don't ever want to see the Smalltalk language grow beyond
> its current state?  We have a special operator for cascades to get at the
> previous receiver, seems only natural to want one for the opposite to get at
> the previous result.  Personally, I can live with Bert's asPipe solution,
> however, I think this is a nice language addition and I'd like to see it
> added in some form.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Cheers
Philippe

> Ramon Leon
> http://onsmalltalk.com
>
>
>