Quick comparison of two Namespaces proposals
goran at krampe.se
Wed Sep 19 07:56:53 UTC 2007
> Hi Chris,
>> Even in todays phat images, name collisions are the 1% case, so the
>> solution should have the benefit of being invisible 99% of the time,
>> and handling the problem as simply and elegantly as possible that 1%
>> of the time. GÃ¶ran's approach seems to do this.
> You could argue that for most of the constructs in the image.
> Almost all classes use the default Metaclass hierarchy. Should we remove
> Almost all classes are pretty shallow subclasses of Object: Should we
> limit the image to a depth of 3 or 4?
> What is requires is a really eleganct unconstrined solution which is
> transparent for 99% of the cases but entirely open to modifications for
> the 1%.
> The Metaclass implementation is a good example of how this can be done.
> GÃ¶ran's solution does not satisfy these criteria.
Please elaborate the criteria you mention.
More information about the Squeak-dev