Quick comparison of two Namespaces proposals
Michael van der Gulik
mikevdg at gmail.com
Sat Sep 22 11:00:38 UTC 2007
On 9/22/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Again, discussion downs not to about how namespaces should behave, but
> > to choosing appropriate and conventional syntax for it. Personally, i
> > don't think its really matters.
> > Please, people, lets focus on more important things, if you don't want
> > to flame this topic, like in previous 'pipe syntax'.
> How code looks is important. If it wasn't then Java wouldn't be the
> current most popular language.
ROFL :-D. You can't be serious about that!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev