[squeak-dev] Re: Completing the 3.10 release process
Ken Causey
ken at kencausey.com
Tue Apr 8 17:53:34 UTC 2008
I appreciate your initiative but could you wait a few days? I started a
discussion of what would constitute an appropriate release structure and
I would like to give a bit more time for comments. Assuming I don't get
any more in a few days I guess I will write up my ideas in a more formal
form and request more comments or objections.
On the other hand this is starting to sound like it might take well over
a week. So I guess you could go ahead and just be prepared to make
further changes later.
Ken
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 16:30 +0100, Michael Davies wrote:
> I've discussed this very briefly with Edgar off the list, and he has
> welcomed my support to finish this work off, so can I ask:
> - Does everyone agree that the list of actions in my first email is
> correct and complete? (I have already made a note of the additional
> requirement to point the image to the correct package universe)
> - Does anyone have any issue with me taking this on?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080408/11714788/attachment.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|